Cyclosporin A - CAS 59865-13-3

Catalog Number Size Price Stock Quantity
BP-900072 5 g $292 In stock
Add to cart

Cyclosporin A (Cyclosporine A) is an immunosuppressant that binds to cyclophilins, inhibiting calcineurin activity with an IC50 of 7 nM. It also inhibits CD11a/CD18 adhesion molecules.

* Please be kindly noted that our services and products can only be used for research to organizations or companies and not intended for any clinical or individuals.

Molecular Formula
C62H111N11O12
Molecular Weight
1202.61

Cyclosporin A

    • Specification
      • Purity
        98%
        Solubility
        Soluble in Ethanol, Methanol, Chloroform, DMF, DMSO; Poorly soluble in Water
        Appearance
        Solid
        Storage
        4°C, protect from light
        Sequence
        cyclo[Abu-Sar-N(Me)Leu-Val-N(Me)Leu-Ala-D-Ala-N(Me)Leu-N(Me)Leu-N(Me)Val-N(Me)Bmt(E)]
        IUPAC Name
        (3S,6S,9S,12R,15S,18S,21S,24S,30S,33S)-30-ethyl-33-[(E,1R,2R)-1-hydroxy-2-methylhex-4-enyl]-1,4,7,10,12,15,19,25,28-nonamethyl-6,9,18,24-tetrakis(2-methylpropyl)-3,21-di(propan-2-yl)-1,4,7,10,13,16,19,22,25,28,31-undecazacyclotritriacontane-2,5,8,11,14,17,20,23,26,29,32-undecone
        Synonyms
        Ciclosporin; cyclosporine; Cyclosporine A; Sandimmun; Cyclosporin; Neoral; Ciclosporine; Sandimmune; Ramihyphin A
    • Properties
      • Boiling Point
        1293.8 °C at 760 mmHg
        Melting Point
        148-151 °C
        Density
        1.016 g/cm3
        InChI Key
        PMATZTZNYRCHOR-CGLBZJNRSA-N
        InChI
        InChI=1S/C62H111N11O12/c1-25-27-28-40(15)52(75)51-56(79)65-43(26-2)58(81)67(18)33-48(74)68(19)44(29-34(3)4)55(78)66-49(38(11)12)61(84)69(20)45(30-35(5)6)54(77)63-41(16)53(76)64-42(17)57(80)70(21)46(31-36(7)8)59(82)71(22)47(32-37(9)10)60(83)72(23)50(39(13)14)62(85)73(51)24/h25,27,34-47,49-52,75H,26,28-33H2,1-24H3,(H,63,77)(H,64,76)(H,65,79)(H,66,78)/b27-25+/t40-,41+,42-,43+,44+,45+,46+,47+,49+,50+,51+,52-/m1/s1
        Canonical SMILES
        CCC1C(=O)N(CC(=O)N(C(C(=O)NC(C(=O)N(C(C(=O)NC(C(=O)NC(C(=O)N(C(C(=O)N(C(C(=O)N(C(C(=O)N(C(C(=O)N1)C(C(C)CC=CC)O)C)C(C)C)C)CC(C)C)C)CC(C)C)C)C)C)CC(C)C)C)C(C)C)CC(C)C)C)C
    • Reference Reading
      • 1.Amorphous cyclosporin A nanoparticles for enhanced dermal bioavailability.
        Romero GB;Arntjen A;Keck CM;Müller RH Int J Pharm. 2016 Feb 10;498(1-2):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.019. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
        Cylosporin A (CyA) was formulated as amorphous nanoparticle suspension to increase dermal penetration, e.g. applicable in psoriasis. The suspension consisted of 5% CyA in water, stabilized with vitamin E polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS, Kolliphor TPGS) and was produced by bead milling. The diameter of the bulk population was about 350 nm, laser diffraction diameter 99% was 690 nm. The suspension was physically stable over one year of storage at room temperature, and most important the amorphous state also remained stable. Despite the high dispersitivity and related large surface area in contact with water, the drug content reduced only by 5% over 1 year of storage. i.e. the formulation is feasible as commercial product with expiry date. The CyA nanoparticles and μm-sized CyA particles were incorporated into hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) gels and the penetration studied into fresh pig ear skin applying the tape stripping method. At tape number 30, the penetrated cumulative amount of CyA from nanoparticles was 6.3 fold higher compared to the μm-sized raw drug powder (450.1 μg/cm(2) vs. 71.3 μg/cm(2)). A theoretical mechanism is presented to explain the observed superiority in penetration.
        2.[The efficacy and safety of modified busulfan/fludarabine conditioning regimen in elderly or drug-intolerable patients with hematologic malignancies].
        Wang FR;Huang XJ;Liu DH;Chen H;Wang Y;Tang FF;Sun YQ;Fu HX;Liu KY;Xu LP Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;52(12):1028-32.
        OBJECTIVE: ;To evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified busulfan (Bu, 9.6 mg/kg)/fludarabine (Flu) conditioning regimen on malignant hematologic diseases in elderly and/or drug-intolerable patients.;METHODS: ;We utilized a new reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) containing of new dosage of intravenous Bu (9.6 mg/kg), Flu (150 mg/m(2)), cytarabine and semustine but without antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in 23 aged and/or intolerable patients with malignancies. All 23 patients, with a median age of 49 (8-66) years, received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical sibling donors during January 2008 and January 2012. Stem cells were collected from granulocyte colony-stimulation factor (G-CSF) mobilized bone marrow plus G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood(G-PB) in 20 patients, G-PB alone in two, and non-mobilized BM in one. The graft had a median mononuclear cells (MNC) of 7.03 (4.04-9.9)×10(8)/kg and 1.76 (0.31-6.43)×10(6)/kg of CD(+)34 cells. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included cyclosporin A, mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate.;RESULTS: ;All patients were well tolerated to the regimen without serious drug related toxicity.
        3.[Penetrating keratoplasty in high-risk children: prevention of graft rejection].
        Pleskova AV;Khvatova AV Vestn Oftalmol. 2014 May-Jun;130(3):17-20.
        PURPOSE: ;To evaluate the efficacy of prolonged courses of systemically administered subtherapeutic Metipred and cyclosporine in prevention of graft rejection in high-risk children.;MATERIAL AND METHODS: ;The study included 27 children at high risk of graft rejection due to re-keratoplasty (n = 8), limbo-keratoplasty for corneal staphyloma (n = 4), or transplantation into vascularized corneal bed (n = 15). All patients were divided into two groups--the study group (n =11) and the control group (n = 16). In order to evaluate the efficacy of two different prevention schemes, the occurrence of graft rejection, rejection crises, and crisis-associated clouding of the transplant was analyzed.;RESULTS: ;The occurrence of transplant opacity was two times lower in the Metipred-cyclosporine group than in the conventional prevention group. Kaplan-Meier one-year survival of the transplant was 53% in the study group and 27% in the control group. Two-year survival rate difference appeared even more significant--53% and 18% correspondingly.;CONCLUSION: ;It is clinically shown that subtherapeutic use of Metipred and cyclosporine decreases the occurrence of rejection crises and transplant failure almost by half in high-risk patients as compared with topical corticosteroids; at the same time the side effects of systemic immunosuppression are not substantial.
    • Preparing Stock Solutions
      • ConcentrationVolumeMass1 mg5 mg10 mg
        1 mM0.8315 mL4.1576 mL8.3152 mL
        5 mM0.1663 mL0.8315 mL1.6630 mL
        10 mM0.0832 mL0.4158 mL0.8315 mL
        50 mM0.0166 mL0.0832 mL0.1663 mL
Bio Calculators
Stock concentration: *
Desired final volume: *
Desired concentration: *

L

* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O c22h30n40
g/mol
g
Related Products
BOC Sciences Support

Please contact us with any specific requirements and we will get back to you as soon as possible.


  • Verification code

We invite you to contact us at or through our contact form above for more information about our services and products.

USA
  • International:
  • US & Canada (Toll free):
  • Email:
  • Fax:
UK
  • Email:
Inquiry Basket